Really? Because looking at 2016 and looking at 2020 Sanders basically dictated the policies that everyone would be fighting over. Paul had no such impact.

Ron Paul was never a legit contender, Bernie came in second.

Are you saying only these two made money after presidential campaigns?

It's just, the narratives are completely different for the two candidates, both in their campaigns, and in their actions after the fact. We can clearly see Bernie had and continues to have an impact.

So why is YOUR narrative so specific? You're demanding we specifically use legislative achievements as the metric, you're clearly trying to avoid Bernie's impact on Dems and the 2020 campaign. You're conflating his campaign and personal incomes and you've got no actual proof. Seriously, if there was proof we'd be seeing 9000000 tweets from the Cheeto. I'm not waiting for shit to complete your crappy narrative, it's bunk.