Your argument is totally invalid.

It's not, actually, and if you could see past your own biases whatsoever you'd understand that "infinite heatsinks" and synthesis are so completely different that you deserve to be laughed out of this subreddit for insinuating otherwise.

In the case of synthesis, you have to actually do something; you have to roam around on a planet or in an asteroid belt in order to get synthesis materials (maybe you can get them from missions too; I've never looked). Once you've got your materials and you've run out of charges, you then you have to do something else: you have to manually activate the synthesis. So "removing the limitations of ships" (which is still a wholly bullshit assertion you should be ashamed of trying to make btw) comes at a cost of time and is only achieved through specific player decision-making.

Infinite, meanwhile, just gives you infinite uses of a thing. There's no cost, no decision-making, no player agency at all.

Your entire argument is built on a pile of rancid feces. You insult me by attempting to pass it off as good argument and as such I'm done with you.