I'd point out that lionizing Rawls off one game against a mediocre team's backups is just as silly as the notion of discarding T-Jack over Archer's performance against the same defense.

Well that isn't true if the rumors of the Seahawks FO trying to trade C-Mike (with the assumption they like Rawls so much he will be RB3). That right there is solid reasoning to be high on Rawls, while being higher on Archer (a football league QB with no real NFL experience) than T-Jack (a veteran NFL QB with multiple games started and won under his belt) is ridiculous.

I don't take issue with your comment overall, it's good. I understand what you are saying, but to be fair i didn't call anyone dumb until like 10 comments into this thread, my original post was attacking just the idea. Attacking the C-Mike fanboy idea that he is so amazing and will be our RB1 when Lynch retires and all that. I didn't say you are a dumb-bass if you believe that to anyone. Do i think it is 12 year old fan level to think that and to think BJ Daniels put up such a great performance that we should trade T-Jack? Yeah. But do i shit on fans who bring up the true negatives/positives of players? No way. But after the 10th new thread asking why don't we trade __? (someone we would never trade) or what do you guys think about ____? and the questions are just mind numbingly dumb...after a certain amount of time you just explode and call out super uneducated questions that make no logical sense for the BS they are. But if the person in their post says "hey, im a new seahawk fan so sorry if this is dumb" then that frustration goes totally away. But if you look at their account and they have Seahawks posts for the past year or more and are saying Rawls could be our RB1 because of his preseason game against the Raiders deep depth players...