Oh, I've read what the EFF has written, and I've responded to it in threads where the OP has been their writing on it. Would you care to respond substantively to anything I've said? Would you care to actually make an argument yourself? At the very least, tell me explicitly what parts of the article you think support your position and respond to the statements I've made. This is pretty much a base requirement for people who want to just offload their entire work to a link. I work in the academic world; a references section is meant to accompany a literature review section. It doesn't stand alone; you have to explain why the reference means something for your position.