So basically 1. You have no argument against my points on their internal accounting reporting, and how it relates to their total financial status. 40% is huge to be coming from one source. That is most likely their largest source of revenue. I've already pointed out multiple places where they are quite probably using funds in a way that benefits them providing abortions without accounting for it appropriately, yet you have no argument why that is not so. 2 you don't think something is legitimate because you disagree. I guess that's fine for an anonymous Internet conversation, but we're talking about the Senate, where listening to ideas and coming together to find the best solution is really the entire point. 3. I point out multiple logical reasons to back up what in my opinion is a strong demonstration that their internal accounting could be skewed. You provide nothing to disprove me, or really even provide a counter argument, while ironically stating that just because I say it doesn't mean anything. 4. Assumption of my entire political philosophy based on one comment about a very specific situation. Then basically just attacking this assumed philosophy without providing any counter argument 5 you literally read my point stating that even though you disagree with someone, you should approach it in an honest way, and try to understand where they're coming from. Your response is to go on a rant about how you don't accept the rational reasoning presented and insist there's some hidden agenda to keep fetuses alive for the express purpose of inflicting a terrible life upon them.
This is literally the only point in which you try to offer a counter argument. The problem is, you still don't counter anything I say, you attack this ridiculous argument that you just decided is what everyone against abortion must secretly feel.