I call this the worker fallacy. Each developer is an expert only in his field, no offense to you.

While you are correct that not all of these are strictly neural network based AI, imo they don't have to be. This whole "AI" worry should be more about automation & technology. Considering the current rate of development we may have an AI replacing a coder before a robot replacing a plumber.

The real quite part that no one talks about are AI hardware (not robotics but chips) are going to be the next revolution that no one talks about.

When I see software guys saying, "it's not about the computing power it's the algorithm that we need to make the leap to AGI" All I think is bruh... Computer freaking architecture at the very least!.

We use ML even in chip design, in physics & material science to accelerate the advancement even at the semicon level. I side on a decade or two as max.

But here's the catch, web development won't be the same by that time. Static sites may be of even lesser value imo. The question is, can the AI of the future replace the programmer of the future?