You're a very angry person. I'm sorry to see that. The OP asked "should employers be allowed to microchip employees". There isn't any burden on me to PROVE that it's advantageous. I opined that if it's optional and mutually consensual it's not by business to dictate if they can.

I agree with most of the other sane folks that the advantages with existing tech are marginal at best. The disadvantages with existing tech are also marginal, hence my call that it's a neutral. I've also not established myself as some moral authority or technical/medical expert- see other comments.

I don't really care about it, and I'm not the one taking it to Conspiracy Land where Big Business is trying to control your EVERY MOVE. I asked to understand why y'all are so up in arms and all you can do is screech angrily at me. That's fine, but it doesn't so much for your case. I guess we'll just never understand each other! :)

My condescension and arrogance is also YOUR opinion. So I guess I'll just go for my run and move on, and you'll seethe and stew in your self-righteous indignation. Good luck with it!