You actually have at least 10 downvotes, for a total score of -9, and none of them are mine. I've taken a screenshot if you'd like to see it. But you're right, I should remedy that -- being that your comment made no sense whatsoever, it didn't contribute to the conversation, and of course that's exactly the circumstance for which downvotes are prescribed.

You might want to look up the definitions of some of the words you used in your second comment. Even if it had turned out better than an incoherent mess, that whole thing would absolutely reek of try-hard; but that it's completely nonsensical at times just makes it that much more hilarious.

Anyhow, to get to the real point, your "analysis" / accusation that my post had been anything even resembling hypocritical, two thoughts:

• Just how in the fuck was pointing that we're on reddit supposed to convey your feeling that I was being hypocritical, or anything else that you said (or attempted to say) in your follow-up post? (and zOMG, you're on reddit too! Wow, what a 'hypocrite!' LOL)

• That accusation demonstrates a really poor grasp on what (I'm sorry to say) is extremely basic logic: The OP took a single known detail about other OP and presumed to extract all sorts of "knowledge" from it. I did no such thing. I literally described what was in the post, and inferred nothing from it.

To illustrate: OP and I both saw a man running down the street.

• OP made the claim that the man is a runner (and a whole lot more on top of that).

• I made the observation that the man is running.