I almost kind of feel like pan-sexuality should be considered like a subsection of Bisexuality, rather than an entirely new sexuality itself. Pan-sexuality can be a useful term for trans people, because it immediately indicates to us that someone is attracted to us. If someone says they're pan it doesnt leave room for much doubt who they are attracted to, but if someone says they're bi thats another case. Bisexuality as a label is a bit more vague and encompasses many preferences, so its not always a reliable indicator of attraction towards trans/non-binary people. New terms can simply help clarify someones sexual attraction, but that doesnt mean we should have to constantly keep adding new letters to the end of LGBT forever. The seperation between B and P is defenitely kind of divisive, and thats why i think it would be better for the P to merely be a subsection of B rather than a separate entity.