So we're clear - the 'yes it's a Walt reference' side making their claim with no facts, insider information or sources to back them up - A-OK.

I never said it's "A-OK" to base anything on just theories and assumptions anywhere in my comment, that's just an extrapolation on your end. That said, there is more 'facts' pointing toward yes than your no. The fact that set design on BB and by association of Vince Gilligan BCS, is so detailed that the very chance that that is accidental is nonsensical to me. Again I'll say, nobody is probably going to confirm or deny it either way, we will probably never know. And it could totally just be to represent how distraught Jimmy is, well, in fact, I'm almost sure that that's the case, it only makes sense. That however, does not negate it being an Easter egg. It representing him being messy and roughed up absolutely does not disprove it being an Easter egg in any way. You saying it somehow does, is absolutely insane.

The 'no it is not a reference' side making their claim with no facts, insider information or sources to back them up - objectionable.

Yes, just as the other side is until someone hired to work on the show says if it Is or not. I already made that point in my previous comment.

I'm not ruining anyone's fun,

So i was unaware you speak for everyone on this public forum. Since you do, speak for everyone, why don't you just agree with yourself in all your replies to yourself via alt accounts and mind control above? I mean, since you do know what everybody thinks. /s

You ruined my fun reading the thread. It's unconfirmable at the moment. So reading people say "No because no." With no evidence over and over and over again to everyone is very off putting. It comes off as dickish. I'd rather read it the one time you'd have to say it to get the point across, like everyone else on this thread. Nobody else is going around reposting the exact same comments to every person on this thread, based on no fact. Maybe If you had a link to a set design guy saying "yeah that was an accident" then reposting to everyone who thinks otherwise would be justifiable. But your literally just saying "No because I think no". That's it. It contributes nothing to the conversation. Say it the one time that's needed and move on, nobody wants to read it over and over an over again.

and nobody has the right to have their opinions or theories unchallenged on a public discussion forum.

Yeah, just as I have the right to say your claims are also founded on nothing but opinions, and your coming off as an asshole to everyone, for all the reasons I stated above.

Also, your assumption that I reply to people to get a reaction is unfounded.

I said unless you just like challenging people to get a reaction out've them. I didn't make any claims, even though your actions currently are just proving that claim that I never actually claimed.