Another upvoted post demonstrating a complete lack of awareness that other sexes sexuality cannot be judged from your own limited perspective.

The fact that you are equating tertiary sexual characteristics with primary ones only tells me you are not equipped to have a valid opinion on this topic.

First of all, panties would not be visible in a school environment in the first place, so that part of the reply is simple nonsense.

So on to the relevant example:

Lipstick is designed to be eye catching and to provide contrast. It is a very minor sexual signal. It is not sexually arousing. This is grand canyon sized false equivalency. It's bewildering how you could come up with this as a valid example unless you think male sexuality and your sexuality are the same. I mean, you are equally stimulated by both so men are also right? You realize the slippery slope argument is a logical fallacy anyhow, right? A woman wearing or not wearing lipstick has zero effect on my sexual response as a male. Zero. Breasts have an innate unconscious sexually arousing effect. Even more so, untethered, they move around quite a lot constantly drawing ones eye. You have the equivalent of a sexually arousing hanging ball of yarn and you're shaming your cat for not ignoring it.

Do women really not understand that our sexual response is different from yours? That these reactions are innate and biological and that they don't have an equivalent response to draw on and that their opinion on this matter is about as relevant as my opinion about how you should feel during menstruation? That this is equivalent to men shaming you for emotional outbursts during that time?