why was the outlawing inevitable? how was the idea doomed?

sorry but everything you wrote following that is (also) fucking retarded. people like you frustrate me to no end. "hey, why not just do things the way we've always done them? in three different steps that you have to remember to do every single time, each of which in turn also consist of multiple steps?" because we could EASILY make a product that does all three and then you'd never have to think about it. we could EASILY streamline stuff like this and it would be nothing but a net positive for our quality of life.

you keep saying the idea is dumb, the product didn't work, the inventors were fools, the outlawing was inevitable. but that's ALL you're saying. can you say ANYTHING at all that isn't just your dumb opinion, like WHY, on a fundamental level, can this product not feasibly be made so that nobody has do to all that retarded shit you apparently want everybody to suffer through every time they travel? what is it that makes you say the outlawing was inevitable? why on earth are the people trying to make life more convenient for everyone automatically fools? because it sounds like you're a fucking fool and a luddite to me, and you definitely don't travel