Supreme Court OKs use of public money for religious education

You're being downvoted, but this question is absolutely consistent with the logic of preventing students from choosing to use their state tuition money at religious schools on an, "if you think religion is bad, then it's abhorrent to allow any state funds to go towards it" argument. If that litmus test was applied it would be hypocritical to "force" religious people put their taxes towards school systems they don't agree with (which is obviously absurd, as it's clear to see society would quickly ground to a halt if belief systems were a qualifying factor for not paying certain taxes).

Once again, redditors conflating quoting a smart person with making a smart argument.

/r/Libertarian Thread Parent Link -