I will only live for 80 years on this planet and I don't want to spend a second more debating with someone who thinks it's right to ignore the truth, and can't back down when they're wrong. Head, out of arse, then we can talk this through.

On top of that, your hypotheticals are redundant when Ukraine already has the armaments and training to outfight Russia. Further, if you'd say that only the strictest definition of Ukraine's resources matter, then only the situation here and now matters, not an imagined situation that isn't in existence.

Your point about Russia earning billions - I've covered this already.

Finally, it's not battle tactic when a force withdraws from territory they've lost, it's a loss.

A strategy is to conserve your resources to protect the most valuable locations. Kherson was Russia's most valuable, and they've lost it. It's not a tactical withdrawal, it's a defeat. They'll never get Kherson back, and any land they do claim going forwards will be measured in metres, not oblasts, towns or cities.

I don't want to reply again because you're using bad faith to claim validity in your points, you're asking questions that are already answered and you aren't debating from a position of knowledge, it's from a position of 'I can't back down'.

Let's leave it here because there is nothing to be gained from continuing this, Mate.