As you are doing it yourself. You are commenting under an article that names Eric Ciaramella as the whistleblower.

Each comment increases the ranking of the article in google thereby spreading this public information further. You are contributing to Eric Ciaramella's name being more widely known as the whistleblower by your comment.

Don't you agree?

In this sense you are "guilty" of spreading public information and news articles. If there is such a crime of reading and discussing newspaper articles, you are certainly involved in that. But don't you have a basic right to do that?

To discuss what you read in newspapers? I hope everyone agrees we all have the right to read newspapers and share links to the articles we read.