Tasking developers with creating detailed estimates is a waste of time

Sigh again.

I sent you an award and the note said “you probably think this award is about you. Don’t you?”

That context is simple.

You interrupted a discussion you could have researched by google the AI quote.

Or sent me a private message.

In the before-time, before waves of morons joined reddit, someone proposed that 98% of people who read a thread do not comment on that thread.

There is a massive audience reading what you write. What I write.

It should be searchable and in the future all of Reddit history will.

So you are part of the 2% qualified to comment on whether me and OP were creating a schtick?

I proposed a we could program dual markovian chain to OP. Using movie quotes that were self-referential and see how it danced.

THAT WAS THE POINT.

But you ruined it.

Why?

Well read rules on the nature of bots and read a book or something.

Here is a book.

Read it.

Don’t ask.

Read it.

https://archive.org/details/MarkFisherGhostsOfMyLifeWritingsOnDepreBookZZ.org

https://www.wired.com/2010/02/atemporality-for-the-creative-artist/

Moderators have gone soft. In the before-time, before the “meme stock” attracted idiots people tried to be insightful, helpful, and idiots got knocked the fuck out of a subreddit.

You have any idea how painful it is for me to know we have exchanged what? 5-6 messages.

I have had three morons interrupt me.

So we have 7 including the OG-OP.

If we assume 98% of people do not post and just read the exchanges?

How many people have viewed this public back and forth in say… three days time?

I know the answer. But I have been very nice tonight and answered yours to the limits of your intelligence.

Just answer mine. It is simple ratio. Lets assume t= ∞

How many redditors will read our exchange?

https://archive.org/details/MarkFisherGhostsOfMyLifeWritingsOnDepreBookZZ.org/page/n3/mode/2up

https://www.wired.com/2010/02/atemporality-for-the-creative-artist/

/r/programming Thread Parent Link - iism.org