Sigh again.
I sent you an award and the note said “you probably think this award is about you. Don’t you?”
That context is simple.
You interrupted a discussion you could have researched by google the AI quote.
Or sent me a private message.
In the before-time, before waves of morons joined reddit, someone proposed that 98% of people who read a thread do not comment on that thread.
There is a massive audience reading what you write. What I write.
It should be searchable and in the future all of Reddit history will.
So you are part of the 2% qualified to comment on whether me and OP were creating a schtick?
I proposed a we could program dual markovian chain to OP. Using movie quotes that were self-referential and see how it danced.
THAT WAS THE POINT.
But you ruined it.
Why?
Well read rules on the nature of bots and read a book or something.
Here is a book.
Read it.
Don’t ask.
Read it.
https://archive.org/details/MarkFisherGhostsOfMyLifeWritingsOnDepreBookZZ.org
https://www.wired.com/2010/02/atemporality-for-the-creative-artist/
Moderators have gone soft. In the before-time, before the “meme stock” attracted idiots people tried to be insightful, helpful, and idiots got knocked the fuck out of a subreddit.
You have any idea how painful it is for me to know we have exchanged what? 5-6 messages.
I have had three morons interrupt me.
So we have 7 including the OG-OP.
If we assume 98% of people do not post and just read the exchanges?
How many people have viewed this public back and forth in say… three days time?
I know the answer. But I have been very nice tonight and answered yours to the limits of your intelligence.
Just answer mine. It is simple ratio. Lets assume t= ∞
How many redditors will read our exchange?
https://archive.org/details/MarkFisherGhostsOfMyLifeWritingsOnDepreBookZZ.org/page/n3/mode/2up
https://www.wired.com/2010/02/atemporality-for-the-creative-artist/