A Theoretical Situation or: How I was brought to and saved from the brink of RP thinking

Hello, proud TRP contributor here.

It's hilarious how your hypothetical post proves basic TRP truths and shows that you don't understand them failing to realize the simplest teachings.

There are studies showing that women with a high sexual partner n-count are not marriage/LTR material.

Every competent redpiller would tell you not to get the fee fee's for a sloot (yes I consider women who do one night stands with strangers to be sluts) and would never try to be something more with her ever.

Yet(theoretically speaking) you did the opposite, you got your feelings riled up and then you showed her that you have a weak character by being bitter(weak frame).

My advice would be:

1.Don't get the butterflies for a ons sloot.

3.Learn to hold frame

4.Lift of course

5.By all means, do use sloots for easy and satysfying sex.

Also there is a assertion made here that we don't like sloots, contrary to that we love them, we love to use them for sex and then it's goodbye on to the next one.

It's all they're good for and we love them for that, no nagging for a LTR, they give it up easily practically begging for it and they do crazy sex they're the easiest and about to their true nature. With the only downside being probable STD's but this can be easily avoided by wraping it up.

Even though this is a thought experiment it shows that you don't understand basic TRP concepts and that your frame needs some work.

Hypergamy is clear as day here, but that's only a sure thing when dealing with easy sloots, you should be positive that when she's done with you the next fuck with the other guy is already pending.

The only time you can feel betreayed by a hypergamous behavior is when you're in a LTR or worse married to her, and you find her with the next guy, which is ever so common.

Now stop being such a pussy and lift bro.

Do you even lift DUDE BRO DUDE?

/r/TheBluePill Thread