If you fail to realize the corruption in Congress that's your own ignorance at play.

I didn't say corruption doesn't exist. But if the majority of people cared about corruption, it could be solved by voting.

Nobody has said they want to limit Americans from contributing to their candidates of choice.

Earlier in this very comment string, you said "[Bernie] simply wants to limit how much Big Money can 'donate' to their candidates." How on earth can you claim "Nobody has said they want to limit Americans from contributing to their candidates of choice." That's literally the entire dispute. Unless you think that the rich people you complain about are not "Americans."

Unions for example can donate and I don't see a problem with it because they are a group of people that are organized who together support someone. This isn't wrong.

You just described a Super PAC.

You for some reason believe that "Government" is going to take away your right from endorsing someone. That simply is not the case.

A restriction on how I can devote my resources to voicing my support for a candidate of my choice is a restriction on my ability to endorse someone.

How can I hope to get Universal Healthcare passed when Pharmaceutical Companies donate Millions to sell Drugs at extortion prices?

By voting for representatives who will pass universal healthcare.

Those Millions come from a a handful of Millionaires not the grand majority of Americans.

If it's only a handful of Millionaires, the grand majority shouldn't have any problem outvoting them, now should they?

Your whole rant seems to be based on the premise that people don't have the right to vote. But they do. No matter how much money "the millionaires" have, they each get one vote, just like the "99%". If the 99% were as unified as you would like to believe, they would have no problem electing a government to enact their policies.