Barring the fact that you just made a numbered response list where you practically didn't address a single point in the parent comment, you don't seem to come close to comprehending this scenario.

In no way, shape, or form, in any universe or plausible reality, was Hillary's preference for a private server a tool used for convenience. Anyone with even a smidgen of understanding about the technical side of this will tell you that it is far more inconvenient to set up something like that and maintain it than it is to simply voice your preferences to the actual IT guys and have them sort it out for you. The time has passed for the convenience argument to be made, it's objectively complete nonsense.

However, what bugs me a bit more is how responses such as yours never address the fact that it is now known and documented that Hillary has actively tried to prevent insight into what was going through this server. It is known and documented that she did not turn over emails she deemed "personal" that in no way could conceivably be categorized as such.

At what point do we stop pretending that Hillary simply "didn't understand" what was going on, or that she "wasn't aware" of the fact that she both disobeyed policy AND objectively attempted to misrepresent this disobedience upon insight? How many more damning deleted "personal emails" need to trickle into the public before you could be convinced that she may very well have tried to play by her own rules to bypass accountability? Is it really so unrealistic, that Hillary Clinton may have made a huge mistake, then doubled down on it (for whatever reason) when the pressure started to mount? The issue a lot of us have with this entire scandal isn't even necessarily the private server itself; it's that PLUS the fact that she has now put such a massive amount of effort into sweeping the whole thing under the rug.