Third party investigation finds no animal cruelty during production of A Dog's Purpose according to American Humane Society

You're wrong.

Sure, we can take supplements, but frankly I'd like to live on a diet that I've evolved to eat as a creature- I'm not a herbivore, and if you want to act like not eating meat is 'what we should do', then you're wrong- we'd die without putting vitamins in our body we'd fundamentally miss out on.

Sure, does that mean sometimes I take the offspring of one animal and dip the sliced up pieces of that animal in it, followed by some variations of wheat in flour and crumb form, and then dip it in boiling oil? Yeah. But chicken nuggets taste delicious, because I evolved to find meat fucking incredible.

But if it's cruelty you're worried about, why not tell me about how human it is to till all the fields for your copious soy beans and kill all the bunnies that live there? Or how you spray them with insecticide to kill all the poor insects that try to live on your crops? Oh wait, I forgot, you're above animal cruelty; you just don't have to deal with the fact that animals are gassed and poisoned with terrifying nerve agent neurotoxins that'd violate the Geneva Convention if used on humans, because you don't have to see them when you eat your food, and can sit there preaching about how you don't harm a fly.

Grow up, get a grip and eat your goddamn burger, because frankly I'm fucking sick of you people trying to make a conversation about how we should try be kinder to animals about joining your 'holier than thou' bullshit movement of total double standards and head-in-the-sand ignorance. People like you are the reason PETA exists, and militant irrational extremists utterly destroy the logical organization of animal rights movements that work to help us treat animals as humanely as possible. You set the world back just as much as the right wing extremists when you estrange the people in the middle.

/r/movies Thread Parent Link - hollywoodreporter.com