Those who think SA is guilty, what is the piece of evidence you consider most damning?

This is what Im talking about..its exhausting to even have to explain it... 1) The car on the property - So what? There are not any fences or walls to prohibit anyone who wants to fron emtering on the the property and olanying that car. Even if you have no knowledge of Avery's background can you murder someone a salvage yard is a good place to dump a car. Further there are numerous interviews Avery gave to local stations while the car was supposedly on the property he also brought reporters directly next to the bones before anyone even knew of their existence, no one would do that if they just murdered someone they would not leave the car on the property in the bones in the burn pit in invite a plethora of people onto the property.

2) The Blood - of the month of threads it's pretty obvious the blood was planted the only blood found anywhere of Halbach was in the back of the rav4 nowhere else anywhere.

3) Burn Bucket - everything found in that bucket was found during the time Avery was forced to leave the property it was planted plain and simple this isn't brain surgery.

4) *67 calls - how about should have been at his house a lot earlier than she was he had called her from his cell phone number already and was probably worried that he was harassing her in figured maybe a *67 would prompt her to pick up the phone. The star 6 7 shouldn't even be brought up to begin with because if you read anything about the transcripts it's clear Kratz manipulated the phone records I'm pretty sure it's even documented that they weren't from the phone company he had manipulated them.

So as I said at the end of the day when you look at all the facts involved the only actual evidence they had was that she was there on the property that day there's literally nothing else.

/r/MakingaMurderer Thread Parent