Strictly speaking, your sentence stated the tuition was directly 34k/year. Wasn't sure if you were retarded or not, so I had to correct you anyways. Give up on that argument, you were in the wrong here, no matter how you try to explain it.

Haha, you shouldn't be talking about medical school admissions as simple as that. There is a reason why I got chosen over many other Ivy League applicants, on top of the MCAT. A person from Clarion with great EC's but a lower MCAT can also beat out an Ivy League with a higher MCAT but with not much EC's. You aren't really educated on how medical school admissions work since I served in two of them already for a top tier university, so I will just give you a pass on your ignorance. It really is funny how you're comparing this to a car brand, when it is far from the truth.

This is why it is hard to deal with people like you. You need to attend college to understand this education system. And yes, you make my point clear. If you are attending UCLA for a humanities or social sciences major, which made up 50% of the undergraduate degrees offered last year, to rack up 90k in loans, over the same humanities or social sciences major at a cheaper college, then obviously, something is wrong with your head. People going to engineering or medicine are a small minority in these "top tier" schools, so your point is moot again. My argument is toward those who are racking up a huge amount of debt for a degree with high unemployment rates, then crying about it and blaming others for their choices.

I got a history degree, and "best offers" from UCLA or USC for the same history degree is meaningless to me. "Best" is relative. If that "best offer" makes you take up 100k in debt, then I wouldn't call it your "best offer."