I'm not the last person you replied to but...
The entire report comes down to the Lynch Pin 'Stress' texts referring to Brady knowing that McNally is probably stressed to "get it done".
I completely disagree with this. The entire report comes down to if anything improper was done to begin with. The text messages are a smokescreen meant to distract from the point that it's "more likely than not" that nothing happened at all.
In order to believe that there's a 50.1% probability that any wrongdoing happened you have to either reject the science of temperature and pressure or determine that the product of the probabilities of all these questions being answered "yes" is over 50%:
Let's say you think the probability of "yes" to each question is: 80%, 70%, 90%, 95%. I think that's ridiculously high, especially for questions 1-3 but let's go with it. That gives you a 48% probability that any violation occurred and everything after it is moot. The texts are all a show.
Anderson says he used the logo gauge. Just based on that and the Ideal Gas Law you should find that it's more likely than not that there was no violation to begin with. Let's take a more reasonable look at those questions and set realistic probabilities:
In reality, only question 2 even matter because it can be answered without any of the texts or speculation. It's just that answer plus science which is why I think the rest is a smokescreen. That being said, let's do the math...
Total odds of the possibility of wrongdoing: 0.25 * 0.35 * 0.5 * 0.95 = 4% chance of there even being a reason to investigate further. There's no way to find a greater than 50% chance that wrongdoing even occurred unless you just assume there is and move on to finding a reason for believing that.