Those studies have been debunked over and over. They use incorrect terminology (defining what rape means etc.) and poor study methods. Most are done by organizations looking for an answer that fits the problem they wish to push. Go watch The Factual Feminist by Christian Hoff Sommers. She debunks basically everything you have said. The definition of rape is applied to both men and women in those studies. Christian believes they are too loose, and that nationwide rape isn't that much of a problem, but the ratio of men vs women is still the same. The goalposts weren't moved for the women only in the study.
My belief that women have it so much better than men is based on reality and scientific data. You just choose to ignore it because fit your sex-negative feminist view. Where is this data that says women are not at a higher risk of being raped than men? Or the data that says women on average get paid more than men? I would like to examine it.
I posted my scientific data (two by government agencies, the political one was from a women advocacy group but I'd say any report would show the same results).
Right, so female supremacy is the goal right? What?! No one says women should be 'supreme,' certainly not I. Feminists want equality, otherwise they are radical and I don't take them seriously.
Women are already 10% ahead at high school level and 15% ahead at university level. This is actually one of the few things women can completely take into their own hands as an idividual, it speaks nothing of outside influences.
So nice power grab you're going for. Yeah, there is no power grab here except maybe only in your own delusions.
You just proved you're a female supremacist. So much for equality with your power grab there. This is a non-sequitor. The fact that women have shown to be better at school than men does not prove I am a 'female supremacist.'
I am Anti-feminist because it is ideological propaganda pushed by people who are profiting from it. Yes, advocacy groups typically consist of people that the groups represent. Being opposed to a group for that reason means you would be against nearly every idea or organization that exists today.
They are lying through their teeth and people like you are eating it up. The data supports it, even from sources outside their cause.
I am anti-feminist because I am PRO EQUALITY. True feminists (not radical anti-men feminists) seek to rise females to be the equal of men. If you were truly pro equality, you would support both sides in need instead of villianizing feminism and ignoring data.
The reason women seem like bigger victims to you is because no one gives a shit about male victims. That, and in the cases I highlight data shows women to be at a higher risk. But you are still right, the problems men face are typically under-represented particularly when they conflict with the 'masculinity culture' or whatever you want to call it. As a male who has experienced such abuse I know this plenty well, but it doesn't change the fact sexual assault is more likely to happen to women.
see : Feminists attacking male right's groups
Yeah, men's right's groups that impune women's right, or vic versa, are pathetic.