I want to start off saying that there were no "big words", maybe to the unsophisticated. Your replies comes off as pretentious and condescending. If you're going to reply you should put more thought into it and provide some meaningful discussion.

With that out of the way, I'll begin. You're clearly aware of what the OP meant when he said damage, he was referring to dps and he is correct when he said it deals more damage. As shown in his data, he DID Deal more damage. You need to specify using the correct term if you want to go into technicality. He deals more damage in a time span with accuracy than without. The whole post was to compare the overall damage dealt to a target. And in that regards, Vangertz trumps Kutum. Not about which shows higher numbers per hit..

You demonstrated that you're competent enough, so of course you know at OP meant. Why bother nit picking him? In a sense it's like correcting people's grammar on Reddit. You're both aware of what each other meant, you're fully aware of what the person is trying to convey when they use "your" instead of "you're". Same case applies here. It's not like some encrypted code the OP posted.. He presented his research and proved his point, there's no need to be an asshole and say "Hey, you used this term instead of the other" when the message was clear enough to everyone.

Nearing the end of your reply you kept some sort of morality and I respect that.

Apologies if that wasn't your intention but your use of words and structuring led me to this presumption.

Also replicates is what you're looking for, not variations. You only need a few variations.