So much wrong with what you've said in relation to this situation and I gather that not only from knowledge of PKK, but this same article we comment on.

I mean:

"The PKK,” Trump stated, “which is a part of the Kurds... is probably worse at terror, more of a terrorist threat in many ways, than ISIS."

Later in the conference, Trump continued, “ISIS respects PKK.”

During his answer, he also stated that the US captured members of ISIS, “not the Kurds.” He then called on Russia to take control of the region.

But I'm not here to argue, I'm here to understand your thinking and logic and perhaps even have my perspective altered. So let's use your logic and take your comment at face value....So, America was in Syria supporting a terror organization worse than the ones they allied with this terror org to fight? And as a result of abandoning this ally with knowledge of an imminent threat to said ally, many of the terror org WORSE than the one America allied with have escaped...

Is this the case?

If so, same question exists: why is this a good thing that makes sense?