Right after that it says this.

In fact, at the time it was procuring the amended agreement, Tesla kept secret from LBA the facts that it intended not to order good faith quantities of the part, that it had already decided to stop purchasing the part from LBA, that it had redesigned the part, and that it intended to prematurely terminate the agreement. By this Complaint, LBA seeks money damages for Tesla's breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and fraud and deceit.

That is completely false. Nothing is true there. Tesla's contract says they are allowed to stop ordering parts at any time, even if they told LBA they would order them. It makes it clear they didn't have to buy anything. I quoted it for you. LBA is lying about the contract.

They are claiming tesla promised to buy parts and never paid, even though the contract specifically allows that. I would love to see a PO for the unpaid parts, why is that not attached? Please use the same skepticism you have against tesla against all other things, stop being silly about facts.

They only have a case if they have a signed PO that tesla cannot prove they paid. That is it. No PO is cited at all here. Their total number of damages includes any fees they want to make up, it doesn't let us know if there was a PO or if any order was actually part of that total.