You never once admit that it even looks like a controlled demo and that it's the only day in history that physics was defied in such a way. You got me to admit that I am gullible and dos not fact-check the videos. Regardless of the surrounding argument, the towers would not have fallen completely or that quickly. You never even discuss that, let alone state something that would help me understand that it was a logical event. If there WERE whistleblowers, 1: they would never have reached corporate mainstream news outlets (you know, the many that are owned by only 6 corporations, all towing one party line or the other, but both staunchly supportive of the official agenda) 2: they would be dismissed as you have dismissed me without ever telling me whether or not you EVER even have the theory of "controlled demo" a fair chance within your own head! What if the terrorists somehow planted the bombs at the wtc and that's how the whole thing came down so easily (yes it glosses-over so many technical difficulties as to be a laughably naive postulate, but so many people realized what they were watching was a controlled demolition on 9/11 and the days after, there were some news outlets suggesting that terrorists must have planted bombs, so it was clearly an idea that it could have been sabotaged WITHOUT being an "inside job") but the point is: did YOU ever give it a fair chance within your own head? If so, what convinced you otherwise and please share that information. If not, then why? I'm asking you seriously. You did not comment on the pentagon story I referenced. You cannot explain how there were no holes in the pentagon where the engines would have been. You cannot explain why the FBI was at the hotel (Marriott/Hilton/ whatever) across the freeway within hours to confiscate the tapes of whatever it was hitting the building as it would have clearly shown whatever it was that DID hit the building, but instead they never released ANY of that footage and only released a few frames of a tape which showed something much smaller than an airliner hitting it. You claim to have a logical POV on the whole thing tell me: who benefitted? Larry Silverstein got double his insurance money for those towers since it was a terrorist attack, the government servers at the base of building 7 covered up (or at least tried to, according to Convar, the German data recovery company) financial transactions of put options on the very airlines used in the attacks for millions of dollars, the military industrial complex which has seen enormous spending increases, both for internal (homeland) security and military spending and the private corporations building and selling these arms to the US. Or do you think Bin Laden and his followers benefitted? No one has, since Pearl Harbor killed Americans on American soil, not including bases or Embassies. The Parriot act, which had been posed and failed so many times to further the agenda of the social/financial elite was now completely supported by the population so we would, as Benjamin Franklin warned "trade freedom for safety". You are still far more gullible than I for not being able to see the big picture and for underestimating the cunning of the world's wealthiest and most ruthless policy-shapers. You overestimate the honesty of our leaders, for whatever reason, you seem to think that someone who perpetrated this would not take significant precautions to prevent those who assisted from leaking, whether by active suppression or by having them believe in what they were a part of. If you don't think for a second that leaders have to make decisions about letting a few innocents die for the greater good, you're even more moronic than I thought. They SEND young people to die in war every day. When we allowed Pearl Harbor to be attacked to get the population back our involvement in WW2, the Bush family became even more rich, as they sold arms to Hitler, and then to the US. Why else would the only ships in harbor be the oldest in the fleet? You still don't think there's a basis in reality for the WTC being a controlled demo, watch the videos again and tell me it doesn't resemble it. You're a fucking liar if you say no. Watch any building failure in history and it looks incredibly different. Look at ANY building fire and name one that COMPLETELY failed LIKE THAT or even fell completely due to a fire. Go ahead. I'll wait