if botswana is the best you can do for a black country, you know it's bad. they have ~25% HIV rate (and before you say it's because that's the region it started, whites in the region have a low rate, while blacks in the carribean and americas have a very high rate ~2%); a rape epidemic, like all of sub-saharan africa; highway robbery and other similar crimes are common occurrence; it's super poor. if you hold botswana to a western standard, it's a shit hole.

Since when are sub-saharan africans latino?

mostly mullatos. for example most people would consider dominicans, and puerto ricans latino, even ones that are quite black.

young white people are commonly stereotyped, especially on the internet, as future serial killers, with notably higher rates of doing so than the average American.

whites spree kill at the same rate as other races. they commit more in the states, because the states is majority white. not surprisingly, in china, most spree killers aren't white. that's why the 'whites are serial killers' stereotype is rare.

I don't know about you, but I never really remembered them taking over the most populous country on Earth and quite literally raping their cities, gloating about it, and then 60 years later after becoming a developed, wealthy, educated nation, denying that it ever happened even though everyone knows it did.

people are naturally racist. kinship is the genetic instinct to cooperate and trust people more, the more genetically related they are because of the benefit of one reproducing incurred by the other: shared genetics passed on. this is why multiculturalism is failing. this is why the japanese had no problem acting towards other races in a way they would never to eachother (in a way that black people do act towards each other)