Uh-oh... a neighbor claims he saw the RAV4 being driven through the quarry followed by a white jeep

The DNA was not a conclusive match.

.....This is true.

It was MtDNA which is better suited for excluding a victim than identifying one. The bones could only have said to have been a relative of Teresa's mother.

....This is not. The dna extracted yielded a partial profile which allowed them to conclude that that particular profile would belong to 1 in 1 billion people.

The bullet was found 4 months after initial searches after they had coerced Brendan into saying she was shot in the head.

Lenk, an official who had been deposed in Avery's lawsuit, was not supposed to be there as it had already been reported no one from Manitowoc had taken place in any searches of the property, a clear lie.

Lenk wasn't in the garage. Where was it said no one had from MC had taken part in any searches? First I'm hearing it.

Further the test where the lab tech found the dna on the bulletwas contaminated with the lab techs own dna. It is protocol to retest the bullet in that case, which the tech did not do. That result was fabricated. It was not blood on the bullet. It was her DNA.

No. The control test was contaminated. Not the test dna sample. Yes standard protocol would have resulted in a retest. However, the testable dna was destroyed and no retest was possible. So, an exemption was requested, which was also protocol, and granted. T'would have been a technicality based on a procedural snafu that got the bullet quashed.

Teresa's DNA was not on the gun. Avery's DNA was not even on the trigger.

Right. The idea beig that it was cleaned. You think the cops who were intent on framing Avery would clean the gun of any of his dna or prints? Or you think it more likely that he would clean his own dna and prints?

There is plenty of evidence that Avery was not the last stop, for instance a call released on youtube wherein the detectives say they believe Avery was her second to last stop.

That is the only evidence, as I know it, and to that I would say that was a theory of 1 detective formed during the infancy of a long investigation, which was subsewuently proven to be inaccurate by, well, everything else.

His confession is him answering yes and no or elaborating on facts fed to him by police. He was alone without a parent. He repeatedly expressed his innocence and was told that saying he was innocent would not help him and if he wanted less than 20 years he needed to confess.

You need to read/watch the confessions again. Note the differences between the 2/27 confessions and the 3/1 & 5/13 confessions. Then loo at what the evidence and other people's accounts support.

saying Steven had disconnected the battery and then BAM his dna is found on the hood latch.

No. The dna had been found months before.

Yes everything was planted. Everything. The bones the key the blood the car the bullet and the story in Brendan's head.

You'll need to support that with more than just suspicion.

The things above are just evidence of how misinformation is propgated. People who want to believe it, will believe and pass it along. It doesn't make it any more true.

/r/StevenAveryIsGuilty Thread Parent