Heya, thanks for taking the time to actually reply!
You try to play the same double-speak that feminists do. Most of social sciences are not based on any 'scientific facts', their research is pure self report method where they just ask people for their statements/opinions, and then try to present that as the hard truth.
How would you know which studies I refer to, and which ones are done in which ways? In fact, why do you focus specifically on this one topic of science, when I mentioned science in general?
Do you, on the contrary, have anything at all to back up your claim that all these results are bogus? And while we're at it, what claims are you even calling bogus? It sounds like you're discussing one specific paper, whereas I am discussing science in general.
This brings me back to the points I raised in my OP: if you disagree, you're wrong. But... why?
I should also add, that no studies that I remember having read throughout the years, in Denmark, that were taken seriously, have relied on self-reporting. At least not in the areas we're discussing right now.
You are disgusting. No, it has not been proven, and 'studies' that set out from beginning to 'prove' something are worthless. Here we go with the insults again. But looking past that - how can you criticize the way the studies were done, when you don't know which studies I refer to? I should add that pretty much ALL science, starts out by trying to prove something. You start with a hypothesis. You then test it out, to see if it works the way you think it does. You don't just start testing random shit. That said, I do think I understand what you're trying to say here, and if you mean what I think you mean, I agree! But then we're back to my first point: exactly what studies are we discussing here, and how do you know how they were done?
It is interesting how you're so eager to prove equality and that men are not better, but have no problem with statements that put one sex as better than the other one, as long as the better sex is female.
Of course men are better at some things. Women are better at some things. And both genders can have individuals who are better than the opposite sex, even though it is not their genders forte.
The perhaps most obvious example, is that men are better at physically demanding activities, than women are. Our bodies tend to be built better for it. That also means that men tend to be more suited for jobs such as police officers, fire fighters, careers in the military, professional athletes, and so forth.
Please stop saying, that I'm saying stuff, that I'm not saying! (phew, that's a complicated sentence!)
I would just like to say that within the last day or two, we had multiple posts here trying to shape our thinking and moderate us. Other than this post, there are also examples such as https://archive.today/0hLOB and https://archive.today/CJLqD I'm really getting a feeling there's an orchestrated attempt to try to cull our attitudes.
Yes, because if it randomly happens that a few people post, in roughly the same time, that they disagree with some of what you're saying - that definitely means the world is OUT TO GET YOU! Seriously man?
I even stated numerous times I agree with many things stated here. I noted that I have a history in the PUA community, which is largely related to TRP in many ways. But, because I criticized SOME of what people say here (and I should add, I even went out of my way to explain why this is, in as much detail as realistically possible), I'm "trying to cull your attitudes"? That sounds like textbook paranoia.