WTF??? its on Wikipedia link, #2 result in Google "Littlebizzy"... I thought you are top marketing expert???

Use your words. Have no idea what point you’re trying to make.

so you think another one cannot defaming people, but you can for them right??? Please use correct grammar. It’s unintelligible.

and now supporting fraud WP plugin, and attack random users??? you have many problems......

I have shown no support for a fraud WP plugin. I have shown no support for Rank Math and stated I do not trust it either thanks to the research of other users. I have stated this position many times. Since you’re a serial defamer, you will of course disregard my actual, explicit position on the matter. Over and over again.

you have many problems......

Clearly not as many as you. Unlike yourself, I have not been sued for defamation. Unlike yourself, I haven’t tried to defame an innocent person reporting on your case. Unlike yourself, I haven’t published naked pictures of an innocent, young girl to defame their father. You sir, have many problems.

this topic about Rank Math SEO, not about you......

You’re right. Then again, I’m not making it about me. I simply warned people to disregard your blog post.

You’re the one who decided to personally reply to my comment with several possible examples of defamation. Here’s my count of people you have tried to defame in that single post: 1) Rank Math defamation? Possibly but let’s wait and see. You better hope they a dirty, otherwise it’s definitely defamation. 2) Neumont University - dude you have already been sued for this. Looking fo another lawsuit by calling them fake again? 3) Neumont’s ex CEO. The only person who has said they were fired was you. Yet they were still employed by the university. Defamation 100%. 4) insinuating that the university lost their accreditation because of the lawsuit. Another lie.

We can’t trust a thing you say. No wonder you have been sued. I wonder if Rank Math has seen your blog post?