Idk why but this so stupid from vedius. Cmon, i expect better from him. It is so simple. Winner = better. TL win final so they are better! Why the f TSM is better then they lose?

I think vedius should say TSM has more potential, higher ceiling blah2. I dont care about that coz i think so too. I see BB has high potential to be like bjerg. But to start a discussion claiming TSM is better at spring final is stupid.

And for the point saying tsm had better style. I dont see much either. What i see is TSM has better topside so they play through that( you can see akadiaan trying SO HARD to gank top) and TL has better botside. So they take advantage through that. Midlane is equal. Jg i dont see much who get adv either. What i see akaddian is op on reksai. And if you comparea huge lead tsm game 2 and tl game 4. I think tl win at game 4 is more convincing.

And you still love to argue TSM is better so why the f then you cant comeback and fight after zven horrible int??? I can give you a list of situation that IF TSM PLAT BETTER, they can won

1) akaddian fail attempt to steal baron : if he get it a huge tsm chance tsm won

2) zven fail to perdict bait from jensen at bush and eventually died. Jensen outsmart him

3) bjerg understimate dl dps and at the end died at red side jungle camp.

4) smoothie died at baron. Actually i like that tsm try to q or poke at bush to check but jensen is too op at bush. So in the end smoothie died. A cricuial moment for tl to get baron.

5) fail bb tp flank at last minute of game. You can see they switch target. I think bjerg and zven focus on impact.

And still TSM is better????? Cmon bruh