I'm going to refute evidence without even looking at it

Its copy pasted from a list i compiled myself btw

you completely overlook the most damning evidence and point out things that are just more minor points and try to olay gotcha with certain words.

The second link mentions busses but BUSSES ARE BESIDE THE POINT. But let's derail the conversation over semantics. Oh yeah okeefe is a big mean man so that somehow makes recorded evidence not true.

Didn't even click on the first damn link. The bernie emails are clear proof of intent and the attitudes of the dnc establishment. They were sending out an unattributed story about berners being violent (cough birddogging) for christ sake.

Do you not have the mental capacity to look at all of that together? Can't see the forest for the trees

The Afghan thing was only a minor point (i said possible) but it was Hillary. You didn't listen to the recording about what she said about palestine did you? or her admitting cheating in 2008 in Michigan?

The point of all that is she's a proven cheater. It speaks to her capacity to do something like that.

And please explain the logical fallacy. I'm saying those stats won't capture things they don't know about.