So as employees, we're required to report obvious abuse to the management that's abusing us? Do you not see the flaw in that logic?
When did I even elude to that?
I was in the Navy. When a sailor has a problem with someone in their chain of command, there are channels for reporting that person without their knowledge and for good goddamn reason. Do you want to be 1,000 miles away from land and civilization, in the middle of the ocean in a situation where you can only appeal to one person?
You're a little slow, aren't you? I clearly stated that this guy has no idea what was going on, now this case has blown up on the news and he's probably going to find out about it THROUGH the news. He had no hand in his bosses talking to her, no hand in them firing her, and no hand in the decision of her to release all this information to the public.
Now, based on her single accusation - after 15 years of zero incidents - he will likely lose his job and his reputation and perhaps even his family because, when it comes to situations like this, the burden of proof shifts from the accuser to the accused.
He may have done it, but he may not have. I'm trying to provide perspective - don't get pissed off at the un-named alleged simply because he was alleged.
What's stupid is the managers' actions and then HER actions to go to the news first instead of an attorney (which demonstrates to me attention-seeking behavior).
This guy - who is being accused - shouldn't be thrown under the bus until the details come out, but that is likely to happen.
If that were my wife he'd be lucky to be walking at this point.
Alright big boy -- you done beating your chest now?
That woman was there to work. Not to be fondled like some harem girl. I've seen this sort of shit too much to just disregard her story.
That's the problem, damn near everybody is going to share your opinion. Girl screams "someone touched my butt" everyone believes it and now it's up tot his guy - who was just blindsided - to somehow prove he DIDN'T rather than her prove that HE DID.