As a former highschool "edgelord" (I didn't call myself that, but I loved offending people,) and a stand up comedian today, I cringe when creepy, pervy, excessively violent crap is defended by its creators like there's a mystery why anyone would consider their tastes distasteful!? I am all for free speech and not getting thrown in jail because you fantasize about creepy shit and don't hurt anyone ever, but don't pretend like that means everyone has to find the same rude shit you like tolerable.

You want to compare yourself to South Park, one of the most successful boundary-pushing pieces of media in the last 10 years? SP knows how to do this shit with finesse. They don't sheepishly defend an obviously pornographic piece of media as if it's high art. They employ nudity, poop jokes, and outrage to serve their plots and messages. I'm not exactly saying one creator is allowed to do something and the other isn't, it's just that these creators are trying to do two different things while looking at their offending content agnostically.

South park uses amorphous non-anatomical nudity to tell a joke, while you're using anatomically correct nudity of kids with no real through-line besides turning on dudes who find that shit sexy.