1) Buying and letting go of the correct players after 4 transfer windows

2) Making sure the squad has enough depth

Assuming it was entirely up to him.

3) Implement tactics that suits the players

Point there, like I said prior.

4) competently guide the players on how to attack

5) Making better subs

Lol, just lol

You're completely ignoring the fact that we've supported LVG with a lot of cash and hasn't interfered with him buying the players he wants unlike other clubs with controlling owners or clubs with tons of boardroom politics like Real Madrid.

There's irony in that statement.

But that's what a manager is for. That's what we're paying him to do. If he can't do the job even with a ton of resources and support and leads us into a horrible run of form, there is no excuse for the guy being paid millions to be failing this badly. When a company becomes insolvent do you blame the employees or the CEO? With your logic we would be blaming the employees while the CEO continues to get excused because "omg the employees are bad". Get real.

Guy, I really don't get where you're going with your post, it's just all over the place. Are you blamming LvG or Woodward? Granted I do believe that Woodward deseerves some blame, but a lot of your post is just useless scapegoating, which is something a lot of people here like to do.

We are doing badly because United as a club is being run poorly, and has been doing this poorly since the Glazers took over, even when SAF was there with them. For years Fergie has been protecting them but now it's just getting more and more evident with each manager after SAF and more mundane idiotic, namecalling, childish arguments like this.