Weekly Incel-Saturday Megathread (22 April 2017)

Tried to make an original thread out of this but was told to post this here, so here it goes:

As of late I have been thinking of a future where the matter of the incel question is solved. In the context of the recent debates over which gender has it easier I feel it is an opportune time to share my thoughts. I think I have come to a solution, but before going into that I ought to give some background so you may understand where I am coming from. In my view hypergamy is the default state of humanity. We are not penguins, never have been quite close even in the most monogamous eras. When looking at biology and what works best for reproductive strategy, it is easy to see why. Women have few precious eggs and their part in the creation of new life is far more involved, costly, and risky. Not to mention that they also have a limited time window (hence why women are almost always to ones to say "I wasted my time with you!"). Men have virtually limitless seeds and once they have relieved themselves nothing more is required of them from a reproductive standpoint. From this one can paint the picture of one sex having the imperative to make the most of their few reproductive opportunities while the other has the drive to drop some seed in anything "good enough". Females have the power as the chooser, in this realm they have a better position. One can see that more females have reproduced in history than males, by a significant margin too Once upon a time Chads had even greater power and control, but there must have been a beta uprising later into the agricultural era. The flames of hypergamy have been long extinguished by traditional marriage, religion, oppression, etc. For a long time every beta man had an inflated SMV because of male protectionism, but now that the market is free they cannot compete. /r9k/, The Red Pill, MGTOW, all of this is a choir of men screaming in sharp pain because that heat is rising again when they were raised expecting a chill existence like their fathers and grandfathers. Some have squirmed there way into something, but the hill is getting steeper by the day. They cry to the sky that women have it easier only to be repudiated that all men who have the smallest bit of that sentiment are freaks, for only "creeps" and the lowliest of men share this sentiment right? Voices to the contrary are unaware of the struggle of the average men because all men below the top threshold either don't exist to them or are just in the lump of the "below average" 80%. Many of these gentlemen grew up thinking that they would be accepted because they're C's, B's, and some of them even B+'s. The matter is that women of yesteryear were the equivalent of ambitionless students wanting to pass or slackers content with any grade (though not by their choice), but in modern times they are now the children of Tiger moms who face disgust when they drop beneath the A range in most cases. I have seen this myself as it is growing harder to attract girls at an exponential rate. I managed to have a "thing" with 3 girls that were pretty attractive when I went to a small semi-rural high school but at public university even the 4s and 5s are quite selective. They got a taste of Chad, and that taste changes them as the taste of human blood changes an animal. Society as we knew it is going through growing pains, it is coming undone. In our politics in the broader society and within this board we see a large camp of those who want to turn the clock back to some extent or another (alt right, red pill, republicans, some libertarians, etc) in order to get back to the world the men wanted and we see those who want to further extend hypergamy whether they realize it or not (progressives, blue pill, antifa types, SJWs). Either women are oppressed or there will be mass sexual starvation, what ought we to do? With deer we hunt them down because killing a few now prevents the greater pain that comes from mass starvation. I propose a solution founded in that philosophy. Once we get to a certain level of technology I am certain we will be able to detect a child's aesthetic destiny before he even leaves the womb. Most here would not protest ending a fetal life so early, even if some find the motivation a queer one. I recognize that this is a controversial proposal, but perhaps giving the option to mercifully end their life come puberty. I am not a virgin or incel, but I am close to them in status as their plight is to my heart. It is a common theme among them to have had happy childhoods, one need not look further than Elliot Rodger. Allowing them to have a decade or so of bliss is a reasonable compromise though doing so in the womb would be ideal. But this is merely my modest proposal The other solutions involve reactionary politics or allowing them to remain as they are, but I do not feel that the latter is a real solution. Letting them anguish in spiritual poverty with no access to a real human need is cruelty, but I am open to changing my position.

/r/PurplePillDebate Thread