What is an archetype: King, warrior, lover, magician rebutted

The problem with Jung archetype theory is nobody understands a shit about what really is an archetype. Archetype is an abstract role. Abstract behaviour scenario.

King, lover, magician, warrior - is basical fundamental roles that every possible male human already have. This are basic role.

Who is magician? The scientist type. If you were asked to describe a scientist - you already know the answer.You basically imagine how scientist looks, acts, what he thinks, how he approach, how he stands. All of this stuff. Something close to nerdy piece of crap, but anyways. Now imagine that you've been appointed to some scientific role. Like RnD Expert. Your behaviour will immediately change and will closely resemble your basic image of a magician.

You can continue the experiment with all other 3.

King? You've been appointed as a CEO. And how you perceive your CEO. The Old Lannister from Game of Thrones.

Warrior? Look at Start from Season 1 Game Of Thrones. Watch kung-fu movies.

Lover? Kazanova, many examples from Robert's Greene 24 laws of seduction.

There are many women archetype as well.

The problem with archetypes is that they are fundamental for our psyche. The problem with you is that you're always blind by those archetypes.

You look at your CEO and what you see is wise king. But he might be not so wise. He could be crazy psychopathic kid in king's clothes. That's what projection means in psychoanalysis. You project some kind of 'deep wisdom' on this figure and that's why you immediately want to follow this person. He might be a good person. He might be a great example to follow. He might be not.

And he wouldn't be a wise king at home with his wife.

You've been appointed a RnD role but you don't need to act nerdy. What you really need is to do your job and do it as great as you can. And this nerdy archetype is blinding managemenet. They scratch their heads - who are we going to appoint on RnD-role? Probably the most nerdy looking nerd among all. Not the smartest guy in the room.

Now, let's get closer to TheRedPill. You look at your girlfriend... AND YOU'RE BLINDED. You don't see lies, you don't see manipulation, you don't see mistakes, you don't see her inner game. What you're seeing is the image that you've created.

You may see beautiful wife, or innocent girl, or somebody who needs to be nourished and saved from all the bad things in the world. But you don't see her real face. And somehow out of nowhere she sucks a dick from your best-friend.

What the fuck happened? How possibly this beautiful innocent girl could be mounting two bick dicks in the ass?

This is not real! They probably poisoned her! They manipulated her, mislead her, lied to her! Of course not, she is not a victim.

In fact, woman is never a victim. Woman are really careful watchers. They look closely on what are you want, what is your Cinderella image and then they tried to play this role like an actress. And while they playing this role they simultaneously play their own game. Which you've never seen.

If you reading this words, you've never experienced love. What you always loved was some-kind of archetype or combination of the archetypes.

You've never loved real person. Because it takes a lot of work to love a real person. Real People stinks. Real People nasty. Real People creeps you.

You probably have heard the word from ancient buddhism tradition: "The enlightened sees the true nature of things". And that's what this words mean. Some people see through the game. Through the mask, act or bullshit. Some are not. Guess who's being fucked in the end.

Read your Jung.

/r/TheRedPill Thread