Argument for one person having control of their life.

There’s a fundamental problem with your question. There’s actually more than two people expecting a baby. Everybody already knows life begins at conception, so all people who know of the pregnancy are also expecting the baby. And only the locomotion of the child should determine whether it’s a aborted, it is in the child control because they abort life. Also you can argue the child on the locomotive level expects its own motion in turn and reacts to its motion internally demonstrating expectation of its own reality.

My argument against.

Life does not begin at conception. In fact life isn’t what is valuable morally. Avoidance of pain is what is moral. And since a child cannot avoid pain in this world, both parents should necessarily go through abortion process. And the pain hierarchy on mount Olympus gets to decide who has the most power over decision making. Highest sufferers at the top. So mother has right over father to choose abortion, because pain hierarchy.