What are the pros and cons of a foreign policy that seeks to export and support liberal values internationally, via force if deemed necessary?

Sincere questions for you.

Why do you consider the invasion of Canada to be 'inflammatory' and not the genocide of native Americans? Why do you consider that not 'inflammatory'? Do only European territories matter in your purview? Why is pointing out the genocide against native Americans not 'against the US' in your opinion? Do they not matter to you? Do you think they deserved to die?

Must European territories be civil among each other? If that were the case, all European nations would be 'inflammatory' to you, as all of them have warred among each other for hundreds of years.

Why are facts 'inflammatory'? Are facts not allowable in your purview? Do you believe there is a higher standard than factual accuracy? If so what is it?

/r/NeutralPolitics Thread Parent