What are some Sequel Trilogy criticisms that you disagree with?

That's my mistake for misreading it, but the whole movie takes place over a day, if not two.

The movie takes place over a week. Not a day or two.

How does learning about magic in two days compare to a lifetime of growing up believing in it?

lol. Jesus.

She's not a better pilot than Han. Try again.

In her first time flying it, she pulls off a move not even Han did. Her first time. Her first time flying, she outflies imperials who had years training. Her first time. I guess since she “believed” in flying it that means she can do it.

Every skill of hers is explainable through the movie and her life. This is very much the opposite of a Mary Sue.

They really aren’t. But, sure, you keep thinking that belief=mastery of skills.

By showing that Luke is more a Mary Sue than Rey, and the fact that you gloss over very Mary Sue things for one character and not the other, I'm showing your bias and hypocrisy because you find this to be an issue when it's not.

I don’t gloss over it. Rey is a Mary Sue. Luke isn’t. Nothing to gloss over.

Actually, A New Hope was my first movie. This statement is also incredibly insulting. Its gate keeping people by saying "only a true fan would watch X first and see that the new movies are bad from the start". I'm not responding to any more of this, as it is clearly shown you are misrepresenting facts to fit your personal agenda, using faulty analogies to some how explain something away, and have this elitist attitude of "I bet the first Star Wars movie you saw was TFA", which is also incredibly dumb.

Ok, fanboy.

/r/StarWars Thread Parent