what is the difference between tf2 and cs?

What I'm trying to say is, 300 hours is fucking bullshit and you know it. If you don't have at least 1,000 hours in a game like tf2 or csgo you don't know anything about the game and can't argue at all.

When I had 200 hours in csgo I hated it and found the community toxic and only liked one game mode...

And the same applies for tf2.

Back when I was new to tf2, I found the Lenny face spamming, asshole community horrible and thought that only Hightower was a good map. I also hated all the other game modes.

"Imagine if tf2 had only stock weapons-"

Yeah I'm going to stop you right there.

I am pretty sure csgo has a large array of weapons, you just need to earn money in game by being good at it in each round.

Arms race isn't broken. Arms race is one of the most tf2-esque gamemodes in counter strike. High paced gameplay with almost random weapons and no objective. Demolition is very fun for people who aren't new to the game, as each kill upgrades your weapon. It's a mini version of casual with a twist. Casual is a great gamemode. It's for practicing accuracy on hordes of enemy team mates. Competitive is very fun, if you're Silver Elite Master or higher, because comp games get more serious.

You keep bringing up the "assholes" which is invalid since I have only come across assholes in the competitive environment. In the other game modes, there are more mature people, (not these teenagers you talk about that don't exist) who make mature jokes. These mature jokes seem serious when they aren't, like "oh my god you fucking loser using an awp to kill me? You're bad. Using an ak47? You're bad." And so forth as a joke.

Lastly, Everyone has their own opinion on games. Your original comment states the "fact" that csgo can be played with no monitors because it's the same game every time. That's complete bullshit. OP was an asshole for saying tf2 can be played without looking at your screen and he was wrong, but that doesn't make you right either.

/r/tf2 Thread Parent