Categorizes every objection to their demands as an attack which proves the urgent need for their demands to be met immediately.

You know, as much as I dislike SJWs, I've often rolled my eyes at the description of them as "bullies" - I thought it was overly dramatic.

But today I realize why I do that, and that is, perhaps because of the particular context of my upbringing, when I hear bully I think back to the male kind of bully which were well known among males. Someone who uses physical force to hurt you. It didn't matter how you got your lunch money, the point was that the bully wanted it, so it belonged to him now or you get hurt.

I think if I check my privilege one of the things I really don't think of middle school girl bullies when I think of bullies. The kind who sometimes hit, but mostly use social exclusion and personal attacks to hurt you. But now scaled up to size for the adult world.

Now instead of merely being ugly or stupid, crossing a SJW means you are a worthless manchild piece of shit. Instead of making it hard to find someone to sit with at lunch, it will make it hard for you to stay employed or find a job. If you don't give these people what they want right now, they will seek out a way to use psychology or social pressure to hurt you until you do.

Forever the term "bullying" in my mind will seem overly dramatic for this application - because I can't separate bullying from "hitting" - but it is also an accurate descriptor of this behavior. Instead of having the physical advantage, they have a social advantage which they press without reservation.

Like bullies, SJWs do not first propose the use of the carrot or stick / honey instead of vinegar. There is no initial proposals for mutual benefit except on the rarity to show that they really are nice or caring. In reality, it starts with threats and ends with threats. In a civilized, ordered society, we can't make political decisions that way alone.