I am still waiting for a source on Soleil controversy harassment. I've asked several times.

You've asked once. Ok don't have one. Never mind the fact that the ant-sjw crowd was also involved and infamous for this thing.

I would like to hear back about how you weren't miscontruing my arguments. Or how difficulty isn't subjective. etc.

No. The gap in quality between Marcus and Karla is objective.

No it isn't. Quality is never objective. Learn what objective means.

The gap in quality between Sigurd and Arden is objective.

Ditto

Some units are better at completing maps than others.

Congratulations this is also subjective to one's playstyle and just subjective in nature.

Also this links back to at what point something is "terrifically balanced" or any other qualitative judgement on acceptability of how balanced something is.

There are. These other reasons were not offered as evidence of a grim narrative. Misinformation about character deaths was.

Yes they were. Several people sited the multiple suicides, fighting your own family, and the identity crisis.

But even so that's all irrelevant. You said the fact that the narrative was/wasn't dark was objective or someones disagreement with you was them being misinformed. You moved the goalposts later after I pointed out the fact you made a qualitative judgement on darkness and proclaimed it fact.

And this is why I didn't ping you. A complete waste of my time.

Really? You've accused me of sounding like a satire, and of having a persecution complex, but me calling you an idiot when you kept moving the goalposts and insisting things that are clearly subjective were objective is too far?