What do you guys would think would happen if the U.S. decided it was mandatory for U.S. citizens to have guns and so gave everyone a gun when they turned 18?

It would feel like having to defend being just heterosexual because you are automatically sexist by natural order or by until you make a choice? Perhaps if we only gave guns to the "queers" a sexual orientation war would commence. I think if mandatory gun ownership was indeed forced upon its citizens, they would revolt against the government and thus claim that marriage equality is literally unequal between a man and a woman because they are not physically the same. And such, heterosexuals should only form civil unions apart from marriage because now marriage is only truly equal between a man and another man, and a woman with another woman. So yap, I think words do mean something sometimes unless you redefine the order. For instance, assault rifle bans only specified a specific type of material on a firearm, manufacturers changed their designs that removed the "furniture" from the sell of the weapon, they also replace the magazine because the ban stated in effect that too many rounds was a no no, so they just simply sold them separate, they also made some if not most illegal (Clinton era). This didn't mean they stopped producing (you can't as long as there are conflicts), nor does it mean that our American War Bird Machine wasn't still selling to foreign countries and advisories. It just meant that, when people in the 90's still cared about the 2x party political system, they felt better about the populism of its effect on what they thought was an important issue. And, instead of not reconsidering the effects of deregulating the banks (also Clinton era), predatory lending through adjustable rate mortgages would have not either to had happen that lost so much during the housing crisis in 2005 when bubble finally popped! It's not that they didn't accomplish the things necessary for your success and these are just a few examples, but people still owned firearms even through and after all that... how many people lost their minds because of a personal financial crisis? Could we tie more to the gun debate by showing that if the global recession we are in doesn't succeed, we should just take guns away because we haven't been through the same experiences year after year? Many people still had accessed to the temporary ban on certain items. People kept quite until President GEE DUBYA, lifted that ban and to take note, didn't discontinue Clinton's deregulation of the banks predatory lending through financial "products" like mortgages. I'd go on about President Obama... he too who points the finger to the past still continues policies set by them... but yap! Goooooo Americaaaa! I'd like to see a candidate who wins and never touches mainstream media theater. Because, because, because. Thought: when at the moment of conception, are you' not making a choice? And as a conceived embryo, who gets to halt your decision CREATING process? - Putin 2016 meh

/r/AskReddit Thread