What happened to all the "Indigo childs"?

For perspective, here is David Morehouse's perspective on the RV program history regarding the shut down of the Army's unit. This excerpt is from his book 'Remote Viewing: The Complete User's Manual for Coordinate Remote Viewing'. In the intro to his perspective on the history he adds this caveat: "let me begin by saying, clearly, that what follows is my version of the truth, nothing more."

Damage Control at the CIA

In 1995, Congress directed that the CIA take back responsibility for the program from DIA, DS&T. This was principally due to the fact that my book Psychic Warrior: Inside the CIA’s Star Gate Program was being printed by St. Martin’s Press, despite the efforts of some former members of the unit, who later published their own versions of the unit history using the platform offered by the very book they were attempting to disqualify. The CIA was concerned; a book is considered durable media, meaning it will be around for a long time, and even though this was not the first book on Remote Viewing, it was the first book written by a former “psychic spy” who was linking Remote Viewing to the military and to the CIA—now, that was cause for concern. Let me be perfectly clear on this: it was never the official effort of the DIA or the CIA to stop the publication of any book about Remote Viewing. In fact, the technology was so controversial, one might imagine they were hoping the cat would be let out of the bag so they could justify shutting the program down—but that is just speculation. No, every nasty thing done or said about Remote Viewing, or Remote Viewers, came from other Remote Viewers. The CIA knew it was going to be spread all over the media—even more than it already was.

Historically, when there is controversy in the wind, the agency exercises its right to opt out at the most opportune moment. When this option fails, usually due to a timing error, then the only thing to do is to tell your version of the story first. What followed was an extremely well-executed media blitz, which included Ted Koppel, Larry King, and a variety of major newspapers across the country and in Europe. What Americans should be asking themselves at this point is: Why would the CIA make a decision to tell the people of the world about this program? What purpose did it serve? Were they suddenly afraid that the autobiographical Psychic Warrior was going to steer you in the wrong direction? Did they feel that they needed to make sure you knew the truth first, from them? Let the reader be the judge.

Later that year, under the guise of being an objective study by the American Institutes for Research (AIR), a reputable Washington, D.C., think tank, the CIA commissioned the services of one of the most well-known scientific skeptics in the country. The final report was designed to skew the assessment of the accuracy and usability of intelligence from the Remote Viewing program to such a degree that the program, after twenty-plus years of use, would be deemed totally useless as an intelligence collection resource.

In mid-1995, the program was canceled, and, two weeks before Psychic Warrior hit the bookshelves, the program was disbanded and the buildings were bulldozed and hauled away. Coincidence? I don’t think so. The impact of a writer’s work often exceeds his intention. However, the CIA did conveniently keep for itself all the personnel spaces that were transferred from DIA, DS&T, which is additional evidence to fuel the suspicion that the program lives on in all its original service variations. As I said early in this history, the intelligence community does not place all its eggs in one basket. The CIA would never have left an entire collection methodology open to the potential destruction of one rogue who might write a book about it. Rather, they would keep the technology safe via a standard process of compartmentalization. The government would never abandon Remote Viewing—it proved far too valuable for the money it cost. What they will do is ensure that they never make the mistake again of letting such a controversial and potentially far-reaching technology rise to the surface. They will watch it more closely and watch those whom they train to do it.

There ends the history. What is truly important here is that you move past all of this and discover what Remote Viewing is now and what it can be in the future. There are many variations of this story, and there always will be. I am reminded of Kant’s intuition and scientific reliance on the senses he called Gestalt theory or isomorphism. This theory prompted him to maintain that “truth is whatever makes you live your life better. Only the truth which edifies is truth.” Remote Viewing is truth! It is an empowering art and science that will open the possibilities within you, creating doorways to levels of understanding never before thought attainable.

/r/Paranormal Thread