I agree and disagree.

It's true that Ni is time less but you can predict how events develop over time without really having anything to do with time.

(Before you read the example see what I wrote below)

For instance, when I read this post I thought of how you came up with it. It appears that you have a reason behind your words that you didn't explain. But I tried to guess this reason.

My guess was that you read about Ni, and understood that it doesn't have nothing to do with time. To which I agree. However you didn't notice because you're not a Ni user yourself that you can imagine how situations evolve without having anything to do with time. This is why you wrote this comment

• I hope I'm not confusing you because my example is about my example so in short I guessed your series of actions which lead to this comment being made and why you didn't understand it the same way I did. I didn't use time here it was completely timeless.

If the example is too complicated I'll think of another one