Okay, first nice play on my user name. Props for that. Next, that's not so much an economic statement/attack as a direct personal attack, but for sake of expanding upon my view let's suppose you were burring down a business instead. My out look on the subject is that much like you should know who to kill in a war, you should know who to steal, boycott, and otherwise screw over in a... drawn out economic conflict. I do my best to live modestly, to buy from local businesses, etc, so chances are I'm not your opponent. However, should you find an opponent (likely not an individual or small business), the legality of your economic sanctions is not of particular concern to me because the law has already been heavily manipulated in very immoral and unfair ways (so why would anyone respect it?).

The things that matter far more to me are why you're choosing whoever as an opponent and how good or bad (depending on if I agree with your choice) your strategy is for a long term conflict is. In the base post here, the guy clearly has very poor strategy. However, I wouldn't be surprised if he had good reasons for choosing the opponent.