I believe in the 12 mercy rule, which has some AMAZING pro's and HORRIBLE cons.

The way it works is: After I get attacked 12 times and making my absolute best effort to escape (like, not "dodging attacks" but fleeing the area), I think I'm morally justified to bash a fucking wombat in the god damn head with any equipment possible.

The horrible thing about this? Two things.

1) In real life this is probably a really stupid rule, since if I were to be attacked by a human/animal and inflicted 12 attack attempts, there is a good chance being obedient to this rule means I am actually in quite a bit of frigging danger by attack 13. So my life may not in good hands by implementing this rule

2) In spite of the above life risks and pure stupidity in establishing such a rule, I get no moral credit whatsoever by extreme animal worshipper types for even considering the option (keyword consider. Not "will definitely do") of bashing the wombat in the head and will be hated by millions for even saying such a rechid thing.

Oh yeah, wondering what the positive was? That I get to feel merciful and an executor of supreme patience toward this angry misguided animal while trying my best to value my life if the aggression doesn't stop, ignorant to the fact that people out there may hate me profusely anyway. Including the wombat. The wombat clearly gives no fucks